This year the Council has been able to expand all three of these programs
significantly.
Enforcement Report
The year 1998 was a “difficult” one for the
Council’s enforcement program. Cases such as the following description of the
Council’s lawsuits against local newspapers, have made it difficult. Victories
followed by defeats followed by more victories make the struggle to end housing
discrimination a constant battle. The Council had hoped that 30 years after the
enactment of the Fair Housing Act, the battle to enforce housing discrimination
law would be over. On the contrary, it sometimes seems very discouraging to feel
that if the Council ceased its enforcement activities housing discrimination
would only increase again. But the dedicated staff and board battle on...
Discriminatory Newspaper Advertising
On March 31, the Third Circuit Court of appeals ruled on the Council’s
cases against the Main Line Times and Montgomery Newspapers. It
determined that the Council did not have legal standing to sue the two
newspapers over illegal housing advertising. The Court’s reasoning took the
form of a narrowing of the definition of "injury" under the
Constitution. Such injury now may only be the costs of a non-routine
investigation of a discriminator or a non-routine education effort. Litigation
costs were specifically ruled not within the definition of "injury."
The Court dismissed the FHC's claim against Montgomery Newspapers and The
Main Line Times for illegal advertising discrimination finding no injury
from those specific papers. The Court did uphold that fair housing groups have
standing to sue even though there is no bona fide complainant.
On August 18, in FHCSP v. The Mercury Newspaper, the first case
interpreting the two Court decisions, a federal court ruled that the Council
still has the legal right to sue a newspaper and those who advertise in it for
publishing discriminatory housing advertising. The Court found that the Council
was “forced to...divert[] itself from its counseling and education activities
and begin a prolonged investigation of The Mercury to identify the extent
and nature of The Mercury's discriminatory activity." The FHC also
had to "counteract the effects of the allegedly discriminatory ads" by
having to "teach the law, the meaning of the law, and the method to follow
the law" to various newspaper, Realtor, and landlord trade groups and
companies due, in part, to the over one thousand allegedly discriminatory ads
published over several years by The Mercury.
As we enter 1999, two advertising cases are still pending against local
newspapers. The first is FHCSP v. Montgomery Newspapers for the paper’s
retaliating against the Council in its efforts to stop the paper from publishing
illegal housing advertising by making of false disparaging statements about the
Council. The second is FHCSP v. The Mercury for allegedly publishing over
one thousand discriminatory ads.
Complaint Intake
In addition to the countless persons staff
counseled on the telephone for various housing related issues, the Council
received more than 75 bona fide complaints of housing discrimination related
problems this year. The following charts show what type of complaints were
received and where those complaints came from.


Testing Program
Through a grant from the U.S. Dept. of Housing & Urban Develpment in its
Fair Housing Initiatives Program, the Council was able to expand the office
staff to include Deborah A. Butler, Esq. as it’s new Test Coordinator. Deborah
is an attorney who has long desired to join an organization such as ours that
has a practical hands-on ability to fight for civil rights. Deborah has
experience as a judicial law clerk and an Assistant City Solicitor, and has
handled various civil rights, real estate and lending practices. The Council’s
testing program and tester base has burgeoned under Deborah’s leadership. The
Council now has a wide variety of more than 100 testers. The Council is prepared
to perform housing investigations based on race and national origin (for African
American, Hispanic, Asian and Indian issues), gender, age and for a wide range
of disabilities.
The Council performed 77 tests to determine compliance with fair housing laws
in 1998. These tests resulted in several findings of evidence indicating
discriminatory housing practices. Many of these investigations are ongoing,
several of which will be filed in calendar year 1999. Others are still under
investigation or the findings showed similar treatment between testers visiting
the property. The following charts show the type of protected class tested for
and the county of the test sites.


Complaints & Lawsuits
Besides the two federal lawsuits mentioned earlier against local newspapers,
the Council currently has one other lawsuit outstanding. This case is against
Ridley Management Company and alleges Familial Status discrimination. Watch for
more information about this case in an upcoming Fairways newsletter. In
addition, the Council assisted in an investigation at Highgate, an assisted
living facility in Paoli. George Head, a wheelchair user with a support dog was
denied housing because of his disability. In addition, it was discovered that
this new construction had not been built in compliance with federal
accessibility guidelines. A federal lawsuit has been filed by the Disabilities
Law Project regarding this case and it should reach settlement or trial sometime
in 1999.
Seven complaints of housing discrimination were settled this year at the
Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission, the US Dept. of Housing & Urban
Development, and Federal District Court. The result was that more than 450 units
of housing were opened to members of protected classes throughout the Delaware
Valley. In the majority of cases part of the settlement required the housing
providers to receive training so that they will know how to run their business
in compliance with fair housing laws. The following chart shows the types of
complaints that were settled.

Finally, in the continuing saga in the case of FHCSP,
et al v Eliza Keulian, a federal judge ordered Ms. Keulian in July to sell
her property because of her lack of regard for the judge’s previous orders and
her inability to manage her property in compliance with the Fair Housing Act.
In March, 1997 the Council won a jury verdict against Eliza Keulian and
awarded seven plaintiffs and the Council $28,000. The jury found Ms. Keulian
liable for discriminating against homeseekers by telling them that their
children were diseased, and informing an African American homeseeker that “this
doesn’t matter anyway, because I don’t rent to Blacks.” In June, 1997,
Federal District Judge Anita B. Brody issued an injunction against Ms. Keulian
stating that she may no longer manage her property. Ms. Keulian’s attorney,
Edward C. Harkin, was appointed to manage all aspects of her rental units for a
period of five years. The injunction stated that Mr. Harkin was expected to
engage a professional real estate management firm that would take over all
functions regarding the rental, management and maintenance functions.
The Council had hoped this would finally bring closure to Ms. Keulian’s
long history of discrimination. Unfortunately, this has not been the case. In
October, 1997 the Council again began receiving complaints about Ms. Keulian.
The Council’s investigation uncovered further acts of familial status
discrimination and possibly racial discrimination and found that she was still
managing her property. The Council filed motions of contempt of court against
both Ms. Keulian and her attorney. In July of this year, the Judge found Ms.
Keulian in contempt of court and ordered her to sell the property. Ms. Keulian
agreed to sell the property, the new owner was to hire a professional firm, and
the building was to be renovated to correct township code violations. Final
motions on this case are still pending before the court.
“It’s unfortunate that this had to happen,” stated Council Executive
Director James Berry. “The Council has been dealing with Ms. Keulian for more
than seven years. She has had ample time to change her policies and practices,
yet her behavior has showed that she is completely unwilling to do so. The
Council is not here to put landlords out of business, but in this case it seems
the only way to gain compliance with the Fair Housing Act.”
Education Report
Council staff spoke at more than 50 agencies and events in 1998. These fair
housing presentations provide one of the Council’s most important ways of
disseminating information about consumer’s rights when renting or purchasing
housing, for housing counselors and advocates to recognize possible
discrimination when their clients encounter it, and for housing providers to
understand their rights and responsibilities. The Following is a list of the
many events Council staff spoke at this year: